Showing posts with label Video. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Video. Show all posts

Friday, July 31, 2009

OUTRAGED OVER BLUG DOG ARROGANCE

We've been watching Congress and the Senate to see how things are progressing with health care reform. The more liberal members of the Democratic party are getting frustrated with the more conservative members of the party, called Blue Dogs.

Last evening, the Health bill from the Energy and Commerce Committee inched slowly through the House; eventually leading to a number of concessions made with the Blue Dogs. Read more-

What angers us, and we're not sure if you are aware of this; federal employees (that includes, we believe, members of Congress and the Senate) are under a health care program called the "Federal Employees Health Benefits Program"; and guess what, the American tax-payer pays for more than half of these employees health insurance premium.

While the congressional committees and senate committees are haggling over quality, affordable, (not even comprehensive) health care for Americans, Congress and the Senate are getting access to a comprehensive health and benefits plan that would make anyone salivate. And, once again, the American tax-payer foots more than half of their premiums.

Click HERE and see what portion the government (us) pays towards their premiums, and what the federal employee pays.

-
You will get madder than hell when you see the entire federal employees benefits program.
-
So, ... Blue Dogs and Republicans are haggling over whether to give us single-payer or a strong public health care option, while we pay much of their health insurance premiums, and even more towards all the benefits federal employees receive. And don't forget, we pay all their salaries and even veterans benefits.
-
Call your representatives and tell them you want single-payer (like what the seniors get - Medicare; or what the veteran's get - VA), or what members of Congress receive.
-
Click HERE to find out who your representatives are, and how to contact them (look to the top, left hand corner of the page and enter your zip).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Health Care Realities

By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: July 30, 2009

At a recent town hall meeting, a man stood up and told Representative Bob Inglis to “keep your government hands off my Medicare.” The congressman, a Republican from South Carolina, tried to explain that Medicare is already a government program — but the voter, Mr. Inglis said, “wasn’t having any of it.”

It’s a funny story — but it illustrates the extent to which health reform must climb a wall of misinformation. It’s not just that many Americans don’t understand what President Obama is proposing; many people don’t understand the way American health care works right now. They don’t understand, in particular, that getting the government involved in health care wouldn’t be a radical step: the government is already deeply involved, even in private insurance.

And that government involvement is the only reason our system works at all.

Read more
-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PROGRESSIVES TARGET BEN NELSON (D-NEB)
-
“As Congress approaches the August recess with health care legislation still in flux, progressive groups are making an early push to target wavering Senate Democrats.

On Friday morning, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, in alliance with Democracy for America., unveiled a new television ad attacking Sen. Ben Nelson, (D-Neb.) for slowing down the reform process. Narrated by a local Nebraska businessman, the spot relies on the same type of highly personalized testimony of health care struggle that has become a dominant theme for reform proponents”
-
Read more.
-



Friday, May 22, 2009

THE RULE OF LAW AND MAKING VS POSING A THREAT

Yesterday I listened to the President’s address and some of Cheney’s address. The President was eloquent and addressed many of the concerns that Americans have regarding the detainees in GITMO.

Dick Cheney reiterated the lies he’s been trying to sell to the American people. He’s good at it … he’s done it for years.

Now comes the hard part … what President Obama didn’t do.
He said he would not put a stop to indefinitely holding people suspected (and I did say suspected) of crimes or being members of organizations that vow to kill Americans. The reason why they could not be brought to trial … the evidence was tainted or there simply was no evidence to prosecute them; but, we swear (cause intelligence – who never makes a mistake) say these people are a real threat to Americans.

I got to thinking. A husband hates his wife and her family; he tells his wife he is going to kill her, her mother, her father, her neighbors, her children … and everybody knows how he feels.
He even has a record of violence.

The wife and family go to the police and tell them what was said by the husband. Do we lock this guy up? And if we could, for how long?

A known pedophile gets out of jail. He says he still has urges; we tell him he can’t hang around children, but can we lock him up indefinitely?

The KKK hates Jews, Blacks, (probably Hispanics now) and wishes they were removed from the face of this earth. They have a history of torture and killing. They spew their venom as often as they can and they write books about why these racial groups must be removed from the face of the earth or at least the United States of America. Do we lock all these KKK members up?

How about the National Guard being sent in to take these KKK guys out? Do we do that?

A group of guys in another country hate Americans, wish they were dead and removed from the face of the earth and everybody knows it. Some have even killed Americans right here on our soil. Do we leave the United States and go to another country where we think this group is and lock up a bunch of people that may be part of this group? How about we torture and/or kill a few that we think is part of the group, and, by the way, a thousand or so innocent people who happen to be in the same vicinity get killed. Well, so what … that’s the cost of getting these guys who hate Americans and vow to kill Americans.
None of this is funny or to be taken lightly. These are serious discussions. They involve rights and liberties and rules of law. Is the "threat of violence" enough to detain you, and if so for how long?
-

THE RULE OF LAW

HUMAN RIGHTS

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

DETAINEE

DETAINEE TREATMENT ACT

Obama Endorses Indefinite Detention Without Trial for Some

Koh vs. Obama Administration on Indefinite Detention?

REPAIRING OUR HUMAN RIGHTS REPUTATION

MAKING VERSUS POSING A THREAT

CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

OLBERMANN COMMENTS ON THE MAY 21, 2009 PRESIDENT'S AND CHENEY'S ADDRESS TO THE NATION

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy


Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

THE REPUBLICAN PARTY: A PARTY ENGAGED IN TREASONOUS BEHAVIOR OR JUST A PARTY OF "NO IDEAS", RADICALS AND INSTIGATORS?

-
The REPUBLICAN PARTY is still the Party of "NO"; the Party of CHENEY; the Party of RUSH; the Party of PALIN; the Party of BACHMANN; the Party of Rick Perry; and now the Party of "TEA", and where it has sunk (where it began with Nixon), the right-wing Party of Racists, radicals and dangerous people.

I could name a lot more "racist" or “dementedright-wing Republicans, but I don't want to spend my entire afternoon on Wikipedia and "Fixed" News (that's right, I said "Fixed"). I was going to name Bill O'Reilly ... but I really don't need him or his goons showing up at my door.

The Republican Party (whose current leadership is almost largely right-wing) was just about buried after the 2008 election.* What was never buried was the racist, hate-filled, conspiracy driven Republican playbook that was documented in Robert Parry’s February 25, 2009 article, “The GOP’s Anti-Obama Propaganda” (which I posted here on March 1, 2009)

Now racist people are in both the Republican and Democratic Party; however, one need only look at the Party membership to see that the Republican Party lacks diversity and inclusion. That kind of representation was ever prominent during the 2008 Republican campaign and convention.

After the election of President Obama, gun and ammunition sales exploded, and “hate-groups” went from 602 in year 2000 to 926 in 2008.**

Though the number of Republican Party members has dwindled, let us not take that group for granted.

Let’s fast forward to the “Tea Parties” and observe the context of those rallies. Very few if any people of color were at the “Tea Parties”.

There were radical, irrational rantings and signs about “socialism” [code for welfare] and President Obama’s citizenship [code for Muslim terrorist].

Since the President fulfilled his campaign promise to lower taxes for 95% of Americans, the Tea Party idea was always extremely suspect; and we need only look at the people pushing these “Tea parties” to see that it comes from the conservative right-wing who always vote Republican.

Further, we saw racist depictions of President Obama (on the Republican side) both before and after the election.

Rick Perry and other "so-called" prominent Texans want to secede from the United States which is absurd; and unlike “Armadillo Joe” who thinks we should let Texas secede; do we really want a bunch of radicals to go unchecked within our own borders? http://broadwaycarl.blogspot.com/2009/04/racism.html


See also article on Sarah Palin's husband , Todd: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26524024/

Maps of the 2008 US presidential election results:
*http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/




The Year in Hate: by David Holthouse:
**http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=1027
-


-


-
http://clevelandssecretclub.blogspot.com/2009/01/other-day-i-sent-email-to-boehner-or.html

http://www.theonion.com/content/infograph/fox_news_racism_intentional

http://www.blackstarnews.com/?c=135&a=4676

http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/the-rotting-racist-underbelly-of-the-tea-party-protests/

-

Saturday, April 11, 2009

The Case Against Shell: Landmark Human Rights Trial

-
--

-
The multinational corporation Shell, financed, armed, and otherwise colluded with the Nigerian military forces that used deadly force and conducted massive, brutal raids against the Ogoni people of the Niger Delta. Shell was also involved in a strategy that resulted in the executions of nine Ogoni leaders who were working for environmental justice and human rights, including internationally-acclaimed writer and activist Ken Saro-Wiwa.

The Center for Constitutional Rights, EarthRights International and other human rights attorneys sued Shell for their role in the repression of the Ogoni and the executions of the “Ogoni Nine”.

The case will go to trial on May 26th, 2009 in New York City.

The film was produced by Rikshaw Films for EarthRights International and the Center for Constitutional Rights.

Special thanks to filmmaker Glenn Ellis, for extensive footage from two important documentaries made by Catma Films, The Drilling Fields (1994) & Delta Force (1995), and to photographer Ed Kashi, for use of his photographs.
-

Shell must be held accountable. As Ken Saro-Wiwa's son, Ken Saro-Wiwa Jr. has said about the upcoming trial against Shell, "We need to have people account for their role in the executions and the displacement of the Ogoni people, many of whom feel traumatized. It will be a relief. It will enable people to face the future. That's the most important thing. Let's account for the past, so we can move forward."


-






-

Saturday, March 14, 2009

GOING GREEN WITH VAN JONES

Last week we published our first "Going Green" web page. We happened to catch Van Jones, founder of "Green for All" on Laura Flander's GritTV. The video piece is dated October 14, 2008, but it is so relevant for today. Van Jones was on the panel of the first meeting of the "Middle Class Task Force" held in Philadelphia, February 27, 2009. He is also the Special Advisor for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation at the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ).
-
Please turn off/pause music player to the right of this page before viewing video.
-


http://airamerica.com/lauraflanders/blog/2008/oct/14/grittv-laura-flanders-talks-van-jones

-

Friday, March 13, 2009

JAMIE DIMON GET OVER YOURSELF

Of all the “MOTHER LOVING” gall. Jamie Dimon, “Let them Eat Cake” CEO of JPMorgan Chase (one of the first to make his investment bank a bank holding company who could partake of bailout money) – and now the largest of the bank holding companies – is crying “crocodile tears”, saying we’re picking on “poor little” corporations.
-
HEY MR. BAILOUT RECIPIENT, weren’t you guys involved in Enron lawsuits?
-
Weren’t you also the protégé of Sandy Weill, former CEO of Citigroup; and wasn’t Citigroup also involved in the Enron scandal?
-
Is it a wonder why we don’t trust you or your buddies?
-
The arrogance of these guys is mindboggling!
-










FRONTLINE: meltdown - financial crisis timeline | PBS
-
JPMorgan Chase CEO Says Financial Crisis Will End When We All Stop Picking on Corporations | The Washington Independent by Mary Kane, March 11, 2009
-
-
Dimon in the Rough | The Magazine | Vanity Fair April 2011, Graydon Carter

Monday, March 9, 2009

CAN YOU REALLY TRUST CABLE NEWS AND COMMENTARY?

I was getting sick of cable "so-called" news channels and other "cable chatter" crap that seemed to be aimed at "putting down" the President and his policies. I was also incensed by their reckless and irresponsible commentary on the economy.
-
I truly felt their comments helped to create an atmosphere of pessimism and thus affected Wall Street's performance. In effect manipulating the market. Anyway, I emailed the SEC and FINRA last Friday (slightly after midnight). Here is what I said:
-
"I'm extremely upset by what I'm hearing on CNBC and from the people who appear on CNBC and other cable channels.

The DOW, NASDAQ, etc. are driven by confidence in the market. If you have irresponsible people calling the President of the US a Communist, telling people that the President is destroying the wealth in this country and directing people to buy certain stocks, and/or where to buy these stocks, isn't that manipulating the market? Do these people have a license to do what they're doing? Isn't what they're doing against the law? If not, why not?

Look, if a securities rep wants to sell me something, he has to meet me face to face, ask about my assets and liabilities, short and long range goals, and find out what kind of risk (market, inflation, etc.) I'm willing to take. This person is bound by securities laws. Those laws are in place to protect the consumer.

Well, right now, I'm not being protected ... you're allowing Jim Cramer and others and media conglomerates to control/manipulate the markets. They are not meeting face to face with anyone, asking pertinent financial questions and ascertaining risk ... they are causing uncertainty and panic. This is irresponsible and criminal.

Right now, in this moment ... the American people need you to set boundaries with these people, etc. "

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I also emailed MSNBC "Morning Joe" around 8am that Friday morning letting them know I had emailed the SEC. I'm shocked, but right after that, their tone changed and Jim Cramer did a complete about face that evening. Good for them.
-
Today, however, Joe Scarborough decided to strike out at Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and then made some stupid remark about Congress spending a trillion dollars a day. Following the "Morning Joe" program they said some people didn't like Michelle Obama's sleeveless dresses. Oh please ... give me a break. Then they bring on Warren Buffet who says the President needs to be clearer about his message and focus just on the economy. MSNBC then talks about how the markets were concerned because they didn't know if the President was going to nationalize the banks.
-
First, we know that media had a lot to do with pessimism on Wall Street. Second, what this is about is a bunch of rich folks who own large blocks of shares in various large banks who are concerned about the price of their shares.
-
Let's see ... could those people be stakeholders and the management of cable channels and perhaps Warren Buffet (he loves insurance companies - bet he wasn't crazy about AIG) and his cronies. Clearly Mr. Buffet is not perfect given some of the wrong moves and decisions he's made with his own company. Does Buffet care about the rest of us or just his company; and does he want Obama to take the blame for this economy and Berkshire's recent performance rather than assign it [where it belongs] to Wall Street/big banks/investment firms and himself?
-
[From: "I Blame Warren Buffet" By Rick Aristotle Munarriz
"However, he's also not perfect. As an investor, Buffett is coming off his worst performance -- in absolute terms -- during his 44 years at the helm of Berkshire Hathaway. Sure, he beat the market, but only because he bled less.
-
He owns up to his mistakes. In discussing his unfortunate decision to buy into ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) when he did, Buffett concedes that "the terrible timing of my purchase has cost Berkshire several billion dollars" in his latest annual shareholder letter.
-
It's more than that, though. Berkshire Hathaway's book value fell by 9.6% in 2008. There are 14 stocks in which Berkshire Hathaway has stakes worth at least $500 million, but positions that make up less than 20% of the respective companies. Half of those closed out the year worth less than the amount of money that Buffett has put in."]
-
People can we see what's happening here ... cable is striking back because finally someone is calling for them to be accountable for what they say and how they need to be more responsible in their reporting? Warren Buffet has now become cable's "mouth-piece"; and they are playing his words over and over again.
-
I think you will see in the weeks ahead that cable media will try to pit Republicans against Democrats and vice versa; and will try to destroy the Democrats plans to make this a Nation that cares about the Middle Class. We've now achieved "class warfare".
-
They'll also be trotting out more mouth-pieces to lay blame at President Obama's feet, never realizing (or perhaps not caring) that they are manipulating the market.
-
People let your Democratic leaders know you support them; and don't allow a bunch of rich media conglomerates deflect attention away from them by trying to create "congressional warfare", as well as "class warfare".
-
We voted for Democrats because we knew they defended the working class and the poor (the majority of Americans). Focus people!
-
Let's face it ... ratings drive these huge conglomerates and ugly news reporting is a ratings booster. Beware of all deliverers of news and shy away from right-wing commentary ... please.
-
-
-
-
 
-
Kudos to "Morning Joe" for having William Cohan on to talk about his book "House of Cards A Tale of Hubris and Wretched Excess on Wall Street"
-




Sunday, March 8, 2009

COULDN'T RESIST THIS MICHAEL STEELE PARODY

Okay, I tried to resist putting this video on the blog but I just couldn't help it. I'm hooked on Hilarity today so enjoy.
-
-

-

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

JIM CRAMER'S IDEAS ABOUT THE MORTGAGE CRISIS -GOOD IDEAS OR NOT?

Ok, we all know that there should have been more money for infrastructure spending, but Republicans wanted their tax cuts. So they got some, but then they still voted against the President's Recovery Plan. The President needed more money than $800 Bill; however, he knew he wouldn't get Republican support. Remember that "Oh my God", from Republican House Minority Leader John Boehner when he heard that the President's Plan was going to cost $800 bill? Look, the Chinese allotted a mere $600 billion just for their infrastructure. What the President asked for was pennies in comparison. No big surprise though ... every House Republican and all but three Republican Senators voted "nay" on the President's Plan.
-
The Republicans who ruled the legislature for 12 years had no problem with Bush's spending [for the last 8 years] even though it drove us into this crisis. Now they're just "acting out", because they're no longer in power. Sore losers!
-
[Insert: Wednesday, February 25, 2009: I'm editing this post regarding the above statement becaue I wanted to find out if Republicans are reading this blog ... guess they have; cause they used my "spending" comment to blame Democrats for the crisis and justify their opposition to the President's Recovery Plan. Now I can tell you the real reason why we're in this crisis ... it's called Bush policies, lack of regulation, corporate and managerial greed and corruption ... lies and arrogance ... Got that Republicans!]
-
Anyway, yesterday [2/23], Chris Matthews had Jim Cramer as a guest on his show. Listen to some of Jim Cramer's ideas ... doesn't sound too bad... umm.
-
Please shut off/pause music player to the right of this page before starting video.
-


Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy


-
More ideas from Robert Kuttner:
-
-

Sunday, February 15, 2009

TURN OFF THE TELEVISION AND CHILL!

Hey Guys,

It's time again to shut off those televisions and fold the newspaper in half cause the crazies are at it again.
-
Today is a day of rest and relaxation. Come on over to the BiPolar Ultra Mellow Lounge or see a comedy at the movies or call some friends and hang out and chill (no talk about war, politics or politicians please)!
-
Just to get things started, I'm adding a Cosby special: Enjoy!
-
Please turn off/pause music player to the right of this page before starting video below.
-


Friday, February 13, 2009

LINCOLN MADE HIS STORY POSSIBLE-THE PRESIDENT'S ADDRESS AT THE ANNUAL LINCOLN BANQUET

President Obama addresses the Annual Lincoln Banquet in Springfield, Illinois.
-
Please turn off/pause music player to the right of this page before starting this video.

-


Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy


-

AND THE LIES CONTINUE - RUSH TO KILL AFFORDABLE HEALTHCARE

THE RUSH TO KILL AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE.
-
Betsy McCaughey gives misleading and false information and Fox News, the Drudge Report and Rush Limbaugh run with it. [Side note: Ms. McCaughey received 750 shares in stock options from Cantel Medical before submitting her "op ed" piece to Bloomberg]. Read Wikipedia article and then listen to a segment from Keith Olbermann's "Countdown".
-
According to Wikipedia:
-
On February 9, 2009, McCaughey wrote an opinion piece for Bloomberg.com in which she posited that the 2009 stimulus bill was "dangerous to []our health".[7] She claimed that the stimulus bill would cause a newly created office to "monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective" which was, in essence, "enforcing uniformity." The portions of the text to which she cites, however, do nothing of the sort. Sec. 3001(b) of the bill, which sets forth the "purposes" of the substantive provisions, does not in and of itself do anything but set forth the reason for the substantive provisions.[8] The bill gives the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology no duties to review actual treatments but only to establish standards for a technology infrastructure that would allow doctors to better guide their patients' treatments and to ensure that doctors are given the appropriate tools to establish a proper course of treatment.
-
The "new position" to which McCaughey referred is the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONCHIT) This position was already established on April 27, 2004, by President George W. Bush, under Executive Order #13335 [9], and was therefore not a newly created office. Regarding the duties of the ONCHIT, the draft House version of the Bill required, in Title XXX Section 3001[10], that the National Coordinator ensure that medical records meet certain technical standards to protect privacy, ensure physician office records can be communicated with local hospitals to prevent incompatibilities and inefficiencies, and other such technical requirements. The National Coordinator is also tasked with ensuring that the public has the opportunity to participate in the establishment of technical standards to ensure that the process be open, and promote competition in the private sector for health information technology. The Bill thus assigns the National Coordinator a technical role analogous to that of the FCC, which may define the technical standards to ensure that cellphones operate within a system, but has no role in determining the content of speech on cellphones, or how customers choose to use them.
-
McCaughey's claims that the National Coordinator's office was a "new office" that would control medical treatment was propagated extensively through the media as Rush Limbaugh, Fox News and the Wall Street Journal repeated McCaughey's interpretation of the Stimulus Bill language. [Source: Wikipedia]

-

Please turn off/pause the music player to the right of this page before starting video.

-

-



-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betsy_McCaughey_Ross

-

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

THE BUSINESS OF WAR and THE LESSONS OF EISENHOWER

P lease turn off/pause music player to the right of this page, before viewing video.

-
Our favorite Truth Channel [GRITtv]: A Must See!
We want EVERYONE to know the TRUTH. Mr. President will you level with the American people?
And if you do level, what are you willing to do to stop this craziness?
-
If this video skips ahead 1 day, please go to:
http://lauraflanders.firedoglake.com/ and get Monday, 2/9/09 video segment [The Business of War].
-
Read "Lessons of the Fall: Ike's in, Reagan's out" by Eugene Jarecki: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eugene-jarecki/lessons-of-the-fall-ikes_b_129272.html
-
-

Monday, February 9, 2009

PRESIDENT OBAMA FIRED-UP AND FINDING HIS BASE

A fired-up Barack Obama ditched his TelePrompter to rally House Democrats and rip Republican opponents of his recovery package Thursday night - at one point openly mocking the GOP for failing to follow through on promises of bipartisanship.
In what was the most pointedly partisan speech of his young presidency, Obama rejected Republican arguments that massive spending in the $819 billion stimulus bill that passed the House should be replaced by a new round of massive tax cuts.
"I welcome this debate, but we are not going to get relief by turning back to the same policies that for the last eight years doubled the national debt and threw our economy into a tailspin," said President Obama - sounding more like Candidate Obama than at any time since he took the oath of office less than a month ago.
Obama, speaking to about 200 House Democrats at their annual retreat at the Kingsmill Resort and Spa, dismissed Republican attacks against the massive spending in the stimulus.

"What do you think a stimulus is?" Obama asked incredulously. "It's spending - that's the whole point! Seriously."(Source: Politico)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guys, I am so proud. Finally we've got the President fired-up against the Republican's "let's go back to the way things were and really kill this economy" ridiculous "tax cut problem solving tactics".
Last week [and I repeated it on Sunday], I urged you all to shut off your television and go over to "The BiPolar Ultra Mellow Lounge" or read a book, go to the movies, or if you couldn't tear yourself away from the "nutty tube", watch comedies. Hopefully you did so.
If you did follow my instructions, don't you feel at least 80% better?
Remember people, television (especially cable television -exception: The Rachel Maddow Show) is the last place to get reliable news.* According to media watchdog group "Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting" in consultation with the Survey and Evaluation Research Laboratory at Virginia Commonwealth University, a study that was conducted, showed that a majority of journalists, although relatively liberal on social policies, were significantly to the right of the public on economic, labor, health care and foreign policy issues.[1]
Their study continues: “we learn much more about the political orientation of news content by looking at sourcing patterns rather than journalists' personal views. As this survey shows, it is government officials and business representatives to whom journalists "nearly always" turn when covering economic policy. Labor representatives and consumer advocates were at the bottom of the list. This is consistent with earlier research on sources. For example, analysts from the centrist Brookings Institution and conservative think tanks such as the Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute are those most quoted in mainstream news accounts; liberal think tanks are often invisible. When it comes to sources, ‘liberal bias’ is nowhere to be found.”
I don't think media has caught on to certain realities ... for 8 years they sought out Republican officials ... yeah, Dick Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc. for information. Horrors! But there's a new majority Party in town [the Party of the people]... and evidently, media hasn't gotten the message.
Don't get me wrong, the Republican's used to have some good ideas. That pretty much went the way of the dinosaur starting when the Southern Dixiecrats and racists ran "kicking and screaming" from the Democratic Party to the Republican Party after the 1965 Voting Rights Act.**
Reagan wasn't too bad, ... but he was a "union busting", "tax cut loving [followed by huge deficits]", "kick the disabled off of Social Security, and "kiss the feet" of Big Business and Large Corporations kind of guy.*** Ugh! We languished in the wilderness four years, before businesses started hiring again. Reagan did me no favors, I and my friends had a job before his entrance. Ten months later, I was unemployed and stayed unemployed [there was a job freeze] until mid or late 1985. Thankfully, I was able to go back to college. Those days, college was affordable [and we had Pell Grants].
Sources:
-
Interesting Facts and Comments:
Michael Steele's remarks about Jobs
More of Michael Steele and the Republican Party (and this is hilarious)
Corporate Globalization Fact Sheet
-

-

Friday, January 30, 2009

RNC ELECT AFRICAN AMERICAN, MICHAEL STEELE, WHILE STILL REACHING OUT TO RACISTS AND MALCONTENTS

The other day, I sent an email to Boehner or some Republican House member and asked "Why is it that racists and malcontents are attracted to your Party?"
Well, it must have scared the hell out of them ... cause, guess what?
-
The Republican Party elected African American Michael Steele [moderate Republican, proponent of "drill baby drill" and high deductibles for health insurance] as RNC chair; however, by virtue of their love for Rush Limbaugh, we believe, at this time, they are using Mr. Steele as a smoke screen for their Republican agenda.
-
Now I'm not going to take all the credit, because what really scared them was the election of an African American male by the name of Barack Husein Obama; who is part Caucasian, part African Muslim, Christian, great family man, has lived in Hawaii and South East Asia, etc. This could have only happened in the Democratic Party.
-
WOW! That must have really shook the "core" of the Republican Party.
-
Didn't shake Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity or Bill O'Reilly.
-
This week several Republicans rebuked Rush Limbaugh for remarks made to President Obama, saying he "wished Obama would fail"; however, one of those Republicans apologized to Rush and admitted he agreed with Rush.
-
We are in the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, with thousands of people losing their homes and millions out of work, and Rush, who some consider a leader in the Republican Party; wishes that President Obama would fail. Never would have heard that from a Democrat [kiss of death]; however, the Republican Party like some of their elitist "Wall Street" corporate buddies are an arrogant bunch.
-
Ok, readers, here's more news ....I'm so excited, cause it makes my point [didn't know it was going to be that easy] ...
-
According to Wikipedia:
-
"Steele then entered the Georgetown University Law Center and in 1991, he received his Juris Doctor degree. He worked as a corporate securities associate at the Washington, D.C. office of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton. From 1991 to 1997, Steele specialized in financial investments for Wall Street underwriters, working at Cleary’s Tokyo, Japan office focusing on major product liability litigation and at its London office on corporate matters. Steele left the law firm and founded the Steele Group, a business and legal consulting firm..."
-
Does that not make my point about Republican buddies, or what? A defender of big business and "Wall Street". [Umm]
-
Now back to Rush Limbaugh and his loyal followers.
-
May 6, 2008, Rush called Latino Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa "A Shoeshine Guy"
-
Rush attracts racists and malcontents and they seem to flock to the Republican Party.
-
According to Professor Ekwueme Michael Thelwell ... after the Voting Rights Act of 1965, [that outlawed discriminatory voting practices that had been responsible for the widespread disenfranchisement of African Americans in the United States], the racist Southern Dixiecrats flocked to the Republican Party.
-
"To our distress, what happened was the Dixiecrats, the racists, the segregationists simply migrated wholesale into the Republican Party and since that time, there have only been two Democratic presidents, and both of them from the South. You know, so that the law of unintended consequences, we won a victory by which the whole country suffered, as a consequence of the taking over of the Republican Party by these really renegade, undemocratic, reactionary, backward elements from the Southern Dixiecrats. And they have run the Republican Party ever since."
Amy Goodwin Interview, Aug 2005
-
-
Republicans tend to attract in smaller numbers ... upper class African Americans and Asians; and some Hispanic Catholics who may have abandoned the Party in this past election. But a large majority of Republicans come from the South [that includes Evangelicals] and Mountain West; and, they embrace elitist members of the financial community, the management of large corporations, [esp. those who are anti-union] and certain segments of the small business community.
-
Republicans have a vested interest in keeping corporate taxes low because those are their very largest contributors. In the last 48 - 72 hours of the Presidential election, there were huge donations made from the above named groups.
-
-
I've never known a racist (you know, the ones who violently hate minority groups and Jewish people) to join the Democratic Party [probably because Democrats have a large number of African Americans, Jewish people, and members of the Hispanic Community].
-

Democrats reflect every ethnic group and economic class; however, it has been the only party to consistently reach out to.. and look out for... "Women, and also the Low Income and Middle Income" working class; who without them, this country would be devastated. The erosion of the Middle Class (pushing them lower and lower into the lower rungs of the economic ladder) has largely contributed to the state we are in now.
-
Republicans are strongly anti-union and, if you recall, just the other day, every male Republican except Arlen Spector of Pennsylvania, voted no on the "Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act".
-
Republicans have fiscal policies that benefit their largest contributors - which in 2008 was ATT, (the corporation that allowed Bush/Cheney intelligence to spy on civilians)**
-
Unless the Obama administration disallows this, I will have to change telephone and Internet providers.
-
-
One more thing, I'm really tired of Republican women referring to Sarah Palin as being the first woman nominee for Vice President. Excuse me, Geraldine Ferraro (a Democrat) was the first VP nominee.
-
-
-------------------------------------------------
-
The Controversy surrounding Republican Chip Saltsman:
-
For Christmas 2008, Saltsman sent a music CD of songs intended to be political satire to members of the Republican National Committee. The CD of 41 songs included one entitled "David Ehrenstein's 'Barack the Magic Negro' " set to the tune of "Puff, the Magic Dragon". Its title was drawn from a Los Angeles Times column, written by Ehrenstein, who is partly of African-American descent,[13] that suggested President-elect Barack Obama appealed to those who feel guilty about the nation's history of mistreatment of African-Americans.[14] Saltsman said the song, penned by his longtime friend Paul Shanklin, a white conservative parodist songwriter, who performs it using his impersonation of Al Sharpton, "should be easily recognized as satire directed at the Times."[15]
-
Deborah Mathis fired back on BlackAmericaWeb.com .. December 29, 2008...
"What a pathetic bumpkin Chip Saltsman turns out to be.Saltsman is bound to have learned some things from managing Mike Huckabee’s once-quixotic presidential campaign, which actually had some momentum for awhile.But basic human politics escape him ...
Frankly, that’s the way I like it. I prefer bigots who are too country, too primitive, too proud, and too shallow to cloak their feelings – or even know how to – as opposed to those sophisticates who serve their racism cold and on a bed of pretense.What makes Saltsman’s transparency not only preferable, but vital is that he had hoped to be chairman of the Republican National Committee, which now understands clearly that black and brown support is no longer a luxury, but a necessity.
-
The last thing it needs is to be identified with racial divisiveness and insensitivity.As Mike Duncan, the current RNC chairman, noted, “The 2008 election was a wake-up call for Republicans to reach out and bring more people into our party.”
-
Duncan expressed outrage “that anyone would think this is appropriate as it clearly does not move us in the right direction.”In short, Saltsman’s chairmanship ambitions are toast.For sure, the Tennessee Republican isn’t the only one who got a kick out of “Barack, the Magic Negro.”
-
It was, after all, Rush Limbaugh who introduced the country to it via his radio show.But the blustery, perennially offensive Limbaugh was not in line to set the agenda for a major political party. Now, neither is Saltsman.
-
Interestingly, another would-be RNC chairman is sounding more forgiving of Saltsman than is the current GOP leadership. Ken Blackwell, the former Ohio secretary of state and apologist for the state’s squirrely voting system, blames the media for “hypersensitivity” on race and would not condemn Saltsman’s action.Blackwell, you may recall, is a black man. Apparently, rather than take the party forward, he is more concerned with not offending the bigots in his party by pointing out their bigotry, so as to assure them that he is not the angry black man of legend than he is on taking the party forward. We’ve seen that type before too. The accommodationist, tap dancing his way into favor. The type who would probably be flattered had the magic Negro of note been “Ken,” not “Barack.”
-
-
The Republican Party (a party that racists and malcontents are attracted to) says that they haven't changed their fundamental core values.
Why have they really elected Michael Steele? Smoke screen?
1. Can a leopard change its spots?
2. If it acts like a duck, talks like a duck, then it's probably still a duck.
-
-
Interesting Facts:
Steele on Jobs:
Corporate Globalization Fact Sheet
-
-Sources:
-

-