Showing posts with label BANKS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BANKS. Show all posts

Monday, October 31, 2011

Don't Forget Bank Transfer Day November 5th

Don't forget!!  Saturday is "Bank Transfer Day".

Can't stand big ole blood sucking banks?  Well, you've got a chance to take part in the "Occupy Wall Street" movement, even if you can't physically be at an #OWS event.  If your bank has horrendous fees, is getting on your last nerve, and you just can't take it anymore ... move your money.  The official national "Bank Transfer Day" is Saturday, November 5th.

["Bank Transfer Day" is not affiliated with "Occupy Wall Street"]

Bold Progressives "Banxodus" website


4 Simple Steps for Taking Your Money Out of the Vampire Banks | | AlterNet, by Lynn Parramore, October 30, 2011

Move Your Money Project

Bank of America Campaign on Change.org



 -


Friday, May 20, 2011

Thursday, October 21, 2010

DON'T YOU JUST LOVE THE BANKERS AND THE U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUjA6egGBH0&feature=player_embedded
October 21, 2010

-
-
"The Supreme Court Sold Out Our Democracy - How to Fight the Corporate Takeover of Our Elections", by Joshua Holland, October 25, 2010
-
-

The Curious Circle of Koch: Climate Change Denial Industry, the Tea Party ‘Grassroots’ and Now Blackstone and Goldman Sachs

http://maxkeiser.com/2010/10/21/circle-of-koch/
-
-
-


http://maxkeiser.com/2010/10/19/keiser-report-no-87-markets-finance-scandal-and-bruce-lee-economics/
-
-
-
-

-
September 21, 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CERxBG2bg1U
-
-


-

-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJtbxrk_v7c
September 18, 2010
-
-
-

DON'T YOU JUST LOVE THE U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE?

-
-

-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2bju39fTTI
-
-
-

Monday, January 25, 2010

A Real or Fictional Story of Corporate Deceit and Fraud; and the United States Governments involvement to cover it up.




I heard some ignoramus on CNN say that no one should have interfered with the “goings on” of Citigroup, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan Chase, etc. because these companies would have recovered on their own (normal business cycle).
I love to tell stories so here goes …

A Real or Fictional Story of Corporate Deceit and Fraud; and the United States Governments involvement to cover it up.
Here’s the story (fiction or non-fiction, you choose):
There were a bunch of parent companies that owned retail banks, commercial banks, investment banks, and insurance companies (compliments of Congress by repealing the Glass Steagall Act and passing the Gramm, Leach, Bliley Act - cooked up by Republicans who got a bunch of Democrats [and a Democratic White House] to go along with it). ***
-

The investment banks engaged in questionable trades and bought shares of stock (for themselves and other investors) in certain assets and companies that they either knew didn’t exist, or at best, were extremely risky . They got investors (individual and institutional) to buy into their questionable dealings. They also bundled a bunch of risky mortgages from the parent companies retail banks and mortgage companies, and sold them to people all over the world, thereby engaging in a worldwide ponzi scheme.
-

In addition to that scheme, they also used deposits from their retail banks and bought insurance from their own insurance companies or other insurance companies to hedge their bets. Many of these insurance companies they knew didn’t have enough reserves set aside if things went bad.
-

In the meantime, executives were siphoning off profits through insanely outrageous salaries and bonuses. Some of the large shareholders (who consisted of company executives, board members, and the “Wall Street connected” extremely wealthy) consistently voted for and wooed certain board members who agreed with these outrageous executive compensation packages, and they recommended to the smaller shareholders that they go along with their choices.
-

All these companies knew what the other was doing; and they were well aware that their schemes were built on a “house of cards” that could topple world economies; however, they didn’t really worry too much because they knew someone (a sheikh or two, the government, their retail bank depositors, corrupt insurance companies, the FED, etc) would bail them out.
-

[In addition, these companies and the military contracting companies they bought shares in, encouraged (lobbied) members of Congress, who engaged in the politics of fear [of real and imagined enemies], to use these military contracting companies.]****
-

Anyway, when some of these companies “shit hit the fan”, and the stock market kept falling, and people started defaulting on their mortgages because they couldn’t increase their credit card
limits anymore or refinance their homes any more (property values that were over-valued had declined; many had lost their jobs because companies couldn’t compete with foreign imports and closed shop [compliments of
NAFTA and other government trade policies]; or companies continued offshore outsourcing jobs to cut labor costs starting not at the top, but with middle and bottom wage earners ).
-

The small business owner lost business because various members of Congress (especially conservative members who championed deregulation), consistently engaged in policies and/or wrote laws that allowed large companies to get bigger (whereby small companies couldn’t compete).


People began realizing that they were living in a fantasy world and they never made enough money to pay for their kids college, or invest for retirement, or buy furniture, or dress for success, or buy a house, etc. They were living on borrowed money, and their bank executives and investment brokers, and other people’s bank executives and investment brokers were living high on the hog with their money [that was eventually mostly gambled away].
-

The government, to cover up their duplicity in the schemes, yelled the “sky is falling” and feigned gross ignorance. They allowed investment banks to become bank holding companies, and got other countries (debt), the FDIC and tax-payers to loan and bail out all their asses.

Finally (to put the icing on the cake), the (majority conservative) Supreme Court, used a case before it (under the guise of free speech), to allow corporations to further influence politics, thereby giving their blessing to the continuance of these schemes and cover-ups.**
-
If “Capitalism 201 Gone Wild” hasn’t infected your (especially European) country yet … the story above may become a reality for you.
-
Beware …
-
-
-
 
Update: September 10, 2012

 

 

Update October 27, 2010:
-

Video Added 5/10/2010




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pL3n_dqRfQg
-

Update: October 5, 2010
The United States is its Own Worst Enemy!

-


-
-



-


-
***John McCain Lies - only 1 Senate Democrat (Hollings) voted for Gramm, Leach, Bliley: All Republicans voted yea, except for 1 who voted present (Fitzgerald) and 1 who did not vote (Inhofe). See also Roll Call Vote
-
-
-
-
-
-
'Shadow Elite': Did The Supreme Court Just Trash Free Market And Democracy?
-
The Man Who Crashed the World Vanity Fair - August 2009
-
Community Reinvestment Act - Wiki
-
-
Latest news:
Volcker Rule Dead? Lawmakers Say Key Reform To Shrink Banks Is Unlikely To Pass Senate
-
Lawyers, Guns, and Money by Andy Kroll
-
Wall Street Helped to Mask Debts Shaking Europe
-
William Black On Why "Recurrent Crises Will Get Bigger And More Disastrous" And Why All Talk Of Change By The Administration Is Just Posturing 2/18/2010-
-
Update:
A Trillion Dollar Fraud by John Talbot

Thursday, April 9, 2009

BUSH POLICIES CONTINUE UNDER THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

It is evident that the Obama Administration has chosen the FDR model as a way to deal with the economy. I have no problem with that. Unfortunately, the Obama Administration has made some very poor policy choices.

Let's tackle the banks first. The bank bailout was done to unfreeze the credit market. No problem with that; however, some of the bailout money was given to banks who clearly did not need it [see March 24, 2009 post] and those banks appear to have not sufficiently done their part in unfreezing the credit market; and, in addition, are continuing to support bonuses for doing a poor job [calling them retention bonuses).

The Obama Administration has done nothing to threaten and punish bailout banks that are now actively and negatively trying to influence legislation surrounding the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA). This is a government "of the people, by the people" ...; and not a government of the corporations.
-
-
-

Another Criticism: Why bailout banks and continue subsidizing big farms and food corporations, and not subsidize batteries for hybrid cars before conceivably laying off upwards of millions of auto employees and jeopardizing businesses and their employees who supply parts to auto makers?
-
-
-
This information could be wrong, but I just read that "A number of big national banks stand accused of systematically bilking black and Latino borrowers. And the administration of our first black president is siding with the banks.

At the end of April, the Obama administration will go before the US Supreme Court to argue that those banks—including bailout recipients Bank of America, Citi, Wells Fargo, and JPMorgan Chase—should be allowed to duck a state investigation into their lending practices. If that sounds like the politics of the past, it is. The Obama administration has opted to maintain the stance of the Bush administration—one opposed by the NAACP and other major civil rights groups. And it won't be some Bush holdover making the arguments in Cuomo v. The Clearing House Association (an industry group whose membership includes the world's largest banks).

Instead, the banks will be defended by the office of Obama's new solicitor general, former Harvard Law School dean Elena Kagan." Article by Stephanie Mencimer in Mother Jones.


Next topic: Privacy Rights and Civil Liberties

From democracynow.org


The Obama administration has decided to continue a Bush administration policy of invoking “state secrets” to dismiss a lawsuit accusing a Boeing subsidiary of helping the CIA secretly transport prisoners to torture chambers overseas. On Monday, a San Francisco appeals court heard arguments on the American Civil Liberties Union’s attempt to reinstate the case against Jeppesen International Trip Planning on behalf of five former prisoners. The lawsuit accused Jeppesen of arranging at least seventy flights since 2001 as part of the CIA’s extraordinary rendition program. The Bush administration successfully won the case’s dismissal on the grounds it would risk exposing “state secrets.” On Monday, Obama administration lawyers told judges the government’s stance is unchanged. ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero said, “The] Justice Department stood up in court today and said that it would continue the Bush policy of invoking state secrets to hide the reprehensible history of torture, rendition and the most grievous human rights violations committed by the American government. This is not change. This is definitely more of the same.”"
-

PAY ATTENTION TO A PIECE OF LEGISLATION THAT ROCKEFELLER AND SNOWE INTRODUCED IN CONGRESS APRIL 1, 2009- the act is called, The Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (Voice your opinion to Congress when they come back from break, April 20th)
-
-
-
-
-

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

FINANCIAL EDUCATION SERIES - FEDERAL RESERVE

THE FEDERAL RESERVE 101











THIS VIDEO IS HIGHLY CONTROVERSIAL AND IS A LIBERTARIAN VIEW OF THE FED

-

OTHER CRITICISMS OF THE FED:

-Henry Ford
"Banking was conceived in iniquity, and was born in sin. The Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen, they will create enough deposits, to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers, and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits."

-Lewis vs. United States, 680 F. 2d 1239 9th Circuit 1982
"Those who create and issue money and credit direct the policies of government and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the people."

-Thomas Jefferson, Letter to the Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin (1802) 3rd president of US (1743 - 1826)
[The] Bank of the United States... is one of the most deadly hostility existing, against the principles and form of our Constitution... An institution like this, penetrating by its branches every part of the Union, acting by command and in phalanx, may, in a critical moment, upset the government. I deem no government safe which is under the vassalage of any self-constituted authorities, or any other authority than that of the nation, or its regular functionaries. What an obstruction could not this bank of the United States, with all its branch banks, be in time of war! It might dictate to us the peace we should accept, or withdraw its aids. Ought we then to give further growth to an institution so powerful, so hostile?

-

Friday, February 27, 2009

JIM CRAMER DRAWS A LINE IN THE SAND BETWEEN US AND WALL STREET

I like Jim Cramer, but his latest stunt is shameful. We now know where Jim Cramer stands ... well I guess we always knew where Cramer stood. He is after all, Mr. Wall Street.
-
I did think he was going to stand up to CNBC and not politicize his show; guess I was very very wrong. Ok, I'll stop whining and get down to business. Jim Cramer has sold out to corporate. The minute his show became Cramer versus Obama, it was over.
-
September 2008 wasn't on Obama's watch, it was on your watch Jim, and on Wall Street's watch. Fess up!
-
Let's go back to the 90's when everything was rosy and wonderful ... uh uh. Tech stocks, Internet stocks, Real Estate stocks ... everything just about came up winners. Microsoft split 16,000 times (just joking people) and hit record highs. A whole bunch of people who were in the stock market made a boat load of money.
-
What goes up, must come down. Making a boat load of money, I guess wasn't enough. A bunch of banks/mortgage companies/mortgage brokers/etc. decided to create all kinds of really bad mortgages. Sub prime (pay option, interest only, hybrid) loans, fee ridden loans, let the borrower purchase w both a 1st and 2nd mortgage, and when folks who had run out of money a long time ago, hit their credit card limits, the banks decided to create even more horrendous stuff and almost everyone was allowed to take out mortgages with 100% LTV (esp. Citibank/Citicorp Trust/Citifinancial).
-
Greed was everywhere! Create whatever kind of financial instrument crap was everywhere! Wall Street was giddy and ponzi schemes flourished.
-
Eventually the bubble burst, greed and corruption were exposed and the world reeled and plunged. Well Jim Cramer, you were a part of all this mess; but now it's politics and kiss your CNBC media conglomerate's "be..." Ya'll get my drift.
-
-
-
-
-
 
-

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

MORTGAGE RELIEF PLAN GOOD START BUT NOT ENOUGH

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS CONCERNING THE RELIEF PLAN IS HERE

-

CONCERNS ABOUT THE PLAN:

1a. In the past, lenders did not really modify a loan. They put late fees, attorney fees, late payments, past due interest, etc. on the back end of the so-called modified loan. This has to stop, and any modifications that were done that way, should be re-modified.
-
1b. The mortgagor many times has no idea who to talk to, who holds his paper, and is therefore placed at a disadvantage in any negotiation (given there is negotiation). As Prime Minister Gordon Brown has stated, a lot of these mortgage backed securities were sold in Europe and in other countries. The President, I don't believe, has addressed this problem.
-
2. I have concerns about homeowners slipping back into delinquency. The problem ... no emergency funds for repairs to homes or other kinds of emergencies ... like auto repairs.
-
3. The budget formulas used by the government, and financial institutions are not realistic (not by any stretch of the imagination).

4. Is the President going to tackle minimum wage? Currently low and moderate income individuals and families are not earning enough money; that is why credit cards were used or refinancing was used in order to help pay for groceries, auto insurance, health insurance, car repairs, home repairs, etc. etc.

Those financial vehicles are no longer available to a great many. It's a good thing and a bad thing; because, we all should have been living within our means ... however, again, like I said before, there's not enough income available for what a family or individual needs.
-
5. For those people who are low-income earners, the State or Federal government needs to continue providing free roof, plumbing and structural repairs for a certain period of time. The States used to have conservation programs, free plumbing and roof repairs (based on income) ... what happened to those programs?

6. I would also like (as a condition for qualifying under the Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan), a stipulation that says, in order to qualify the person has to agree to have money withdrawn from his/her paycheck or social security check, etc. to be set aside in a savings vehicle (of their choice).
-
That money would be an emergency fund and could not be touched for at least 2-4 years or until there was a significant amount of money set aside for emergencies. This prevents the homeowner from slipping back into delinquency.
-
7. Next you need to put a cap on how much credit an individual (who takes part in the program) can apply for in the future (at least until they have enough money built up in an emergency fund, or their income increases). A notation would be placed on their credit report which would alert lenders, and prevent the borrower from accessing credit over and above a stipulated amount.
-
8. The President forgot a vulnerable, but significant group of peopleseniors (60+).
-
Many seniors wish to continue living in the homes; however, some were duped into refinancing their homes at 100% LTV or had to refinance in order to maintain their home (roof/plumbing or other structural repairs). These seniors are on a fixed income with property taxes, energy costs, etc. skyrocketing.
-
Many seniors cannot move due to limited affordable rental units, etc. What special mortgage programs and supportive services are there for this group?
------------------------------------------------------------
This whole thing about living within one's means ... wake up and smell the coffee ... the average low income and moderate income family and individual doesn't earn enough money even for basic necessities and cannot save for emergencies. Forget about health care, dental, auto, homeowners or life insurance.
-----------------
-
I recently looked at the Economic Recovery Plan. I am hopeful ... and it is a good start [just doesn't address my above concerns]. So all in all, the President is progressing well with his comprehensive program. He does have an unprecedented amount of issues, etc. on his plate. I wish him well.
-
Read about the ER Plan by clicking the following link:
-